Ny Casino Voter Referendum Wording Challenged by Attorney
A November nyc State casino referendum for voters has one lawyer questioning the ballot’s wording
In November, ny voters are scheduled to vote on a referendum that could allow several casino that is new to be built throughout the state. But if one Brooklyn lawyer is effective, that referendum shall be halted due to language within the ballot question he claims violates state legislation.
Referendum Language Questioned
The language in the referendum features a range ‘legislative purposes’ that paint the proposal in an unmistakably positive light. For example, the concern mentions ‘promoting work growth, increasing aid to schools and permitting local governments to lower property taxes.’ That language was approved by the State Board of Elections in July.
But now, attorney Eric J. Snyder is contending that the language in the bill violates New York legislation. According to a lawsuit filed into the New York State Supreme Court, Snyder alleges that the language violates the continuing State Constitution’s prohibition on the use of public profit the aid of ‘private undertakings.’
‘The Constitution is pretty clear that you can’t use general public money to sway or influence a vote,’ Snyder said.
Snyder isn’t the only one who has had up problems with the language in the referendum. Many government watchdog groups also notice it as one-sided, and groups that are religious also noted the language used whenever telling parishioners to consider social ills that could come with the advertised benefits of casino expansion. Continue reading “Ny Casino Voter Referendum Wording Challenged by Attorney”